Listen to the audio version of this article (generated by AI).

Editor’s Note: Louis Navellier has been managing money through major market cycles for nearly five decades. He was in the room in 1999 — and when someone who lived through that moment tells me today’s AI market is starting to rhyme with it, I pay attention.

Louis is still bullish. So am I. But what he’s written below makes a compelling case — that the difference between investors who build real wealth through this boom and those who lose it in a pullback comes down to one thing: getting tactical before the volatility arrives, not after.

He’s hosting a free event on June 10 at 10 a.m. Eastern with TradeSmith CEO Keith Kaplan to show investors exactly how he’s approaching that — and there’s a free tool available right now that lets you check the short-term health of stocks you already own before the event even starts.

Register for that event here — and read what Louis has to say below.

In 1999, Jeff Bezos was doing something that drove Wall Street absolutely crazy.

Amazon.com Inc. (AMZN) was already a public company. And it was already capable of producing profits — if Bezos had wanted to. But instead, he kept aggressively reinvesting. Instead of worrying about profits, he was building warehouses, distribution infrastructure, and technology systems. 

Every quarter, the margins that should have been there weren’t, because every dollar was going right back into the Amazon machine.

Analysts were furious. Where are the profits? What exactly are we owning here?

Meanwhile, all around Amazon, the dot-com boom was producing companies with no revenue, no product, sometimes no coherent business model at all — and their stocks were tripling. The whole market was chasing a story. 

Who looks most like the future? Who has the best narrative? Wall Street was funding them fast and asking questions later.

Bezos wasn’t playing that game.

What he understood — and almost nobody else did back then — is that 1999 capital was a once-in-a-generation resource. Every dollar of market enthusiasm could be converted into permanent infrastructure: fulfillment capacity, distribution reach, systems that got cheaper the more volume they handled. He wasn’t optimizing for this quarter. He was building something that would be almost impossible to replicate once the window closed.

When the Music Stopped, the Infrastructure Survived

When the music stopped in 2000, it stopped for everybody. The story companies – do I need to mention Pets.com? – vanished almost overnight. 

Amazon went through its own brutal drawdown, but the infrastructure Bezos built was still there. The customer relationships were still there. The cost curves were still bending in the right direction.

By 2005, Bezos looked like a genius. In 1999, he just looked tactical.

I was managing money through all of it. And I’ll tell you — 1999 was one of the best years of my career. It was also one of the strangest markets I’ve ever seen in nearly 50 years in this business. Capital was flowing faster than fundamentals could justify. 

My Stock Grader system kept me focused on what actually mattered: real earnings, real institutional conviction. A lot of the dot-com darlings never showed up in my system at all — and a lot of them went to zero.

But the companies with genuine fundamentals underneath the noise survived. And the ones — like Amazon — that used the window tactically didn’t just survive. They won the whole decade.

Right now, the AI boom is rhyming with that moment in ways that I find both exciting and instructive. But at the same time,  this is not the dot-com boom — the fundamentals are far stronger. 

So, in this piece, I want to show you why this AI boom reminds me so much of the late 1990s… why I believe some AI stocks could be much higher by year-end… and why the smartest move today is not to run for the exits when things get choppy, but to get more tactical.

And finally, I’ll tell you about a new tool that can help you do just that…

The ChatGPT Moment: What Lit the Fuse This Time

I recently got my hands on a chart from our friends at Bespoke Investment Group comparing the Nasdaq Composite’s performance during the internet boom of the late 1990s with its current path during the AI boom.

The comparison is striking.

ChatGPT appears to have done for AI what Netscape did for the internet.

When Netscape came along, investors realized the internet wasn’t just a neat new technology. It was a business revolution. Money poured into the companies building that new world, and the Nasdaq soared.

We’re seeing that same basic story today.

ChatGPT woke people up to what AI can actually do. And Wall Street quickly figured out how much infrastructure that was going to require.

The fact is that the boom is backed by real sales, real earnings, and real order backlogs. 

Look at Bloom Energy Corp. (BE), for example. The company helps make fuel cell generators, which data centers need to produce power on-site so they don’t have to rely on the electrical grid. 

Bloom Energy’s current product backlog is about $6 billion, while its total backlog exceeds $20 billion.

At this rate, it will take years to deliver what is already in the pipeline. And Bloom Energy isn’t an outlier. This story is playing out across the AI and data center space.

Companies are receiving more orders than sales. That makes this a real capital spending cycle.

That is why I remain bullish. Personally, I think the AI and data center stocks across my premium services could be another 30% to 40% higher between now and the end of the year.

But that does not mean investors should get complacent.